USPTO serial 74144379
LIGHT FANTASTIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANAHAN, PATRICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LIGHT FANTASTIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul L. Sjoquist
PAUL L SJOQUIST PALMATIER & SJOQUIST, PA2000 NORTHWESTERN FINANCIAL CTR7900 XERXES AVE SMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55431Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | dairy products; namely, cheese and butter; other dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk, frozen yogurt and milk | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 14, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 22, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 22, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 22, 1993 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 7, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 24, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 10, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 18, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 16, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |