USPTO serial 74144705
MAYA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1789537Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 24, 1993
- Examiner
- POMPEY, TINA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MAYA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | ghees; namely, liquid butters; oils; namely, almond, coconut, corn, mustard and sesame; processed peppers; processed edible seeds; lentils; dried beans; dried chick peas; pickles; snack foods; namely, processed beans and processed nuts; prepared entrees and snack foods consisting primarily of lentils, dried beans and dried chick peas; chana and daliya consisting primarily of roasted, fried and cooked chick peas; dabla, katki, chhunda consisting primarily of pickles, oil, unripened mango, sugar and spices; mogo chips consisting primarily of fried vegetables; chori and moth consisting primarily of roasted, fried and cooked dried beans; mukhvas consisting primarily of processed nuts and processed seeds; urad consisting primarily of dried beans and lentils; rajbhog mix consisting of processed nuts, chick peas, lentils, rice and spices | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | spices; alimentary pastes; tea; condiments; namely, mustard, salt and ketchup; pepper; flour; rice; sauces; prepared entrees and snack foods consisting primarily of rice and flour; chutneys; garam masala consisting primarily of powdered mixed spices; kalonji consisting primarily of spices; rooh afza consisting primarily of a rose flavoring syrup; saunt consisting primarily of powdered dried ginger; sooji consisting primarily of flour; bhavanagri gathiya, bikaneri sev, bundi, phulwadi, papdi, sev, chevdo; namely, snacks consisting primarily of chick pea flour, spices, raisins and oil; flavoring syrup; namely, citric acid used for food purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | retail grocery store services featuring groceries for consumers of East Asian food; wholesale distributorship in the field of groceries for consumers of East Asian origin | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MAYA OVERSEAS FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MAYA OVERSEAS FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MAYA OVERSEAS FOODS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MAYA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2024 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2014 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 30, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 28, 2014 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 15, 2003 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 15, 2003 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| May 22, 2003 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2000 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 17, 1999 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Aug 24, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 1, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 10, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1993 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 27, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 17, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |