Drawing for ROBOTECH

USPTO serial 74144739

ROBOTECH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1714410Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Sep 8, 1992
Examiner
SZOKE, MICHAEL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROBOTECH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

KIM R. FRANK

KIM R FRANK MTN NETWORK SOLUTIONS, INC11205 KNOTT AVESTE DCYPRESS, CA 90630

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042consultation in the field of computer hardware and software, said consultation being rendered by a telephonically accessed computer systemSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDOct 3, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 15, 1995C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
May 23, 1994PRAMPOST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7—
Jan 31, 1994C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Dec 29, 1993C7RFREQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED—
Sep 8, 1992R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 16, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 15, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 8, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 9, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 12, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance