USPTO serial 74144962
FRISCO'S DRIVE-IN CAR HOP HOME OF THE FAMOUS FRISCO BURGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1750558Status 900
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 2, 1993
- Examiner
- MIRMAN, DONNA
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FRISCO'S DRIVE-IN CAR HOP HOME OF THE FAMOUS FRISCO BURGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Downey, CA
Downey, CA
Downey, CA
Downey, CA
Downey, CA
Downey, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | restaurant services | EXPIRED | Oct 21, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Stathoulis, Joanne
- Other trademarks owned by Stathoulis, Joanne
- Other trademarks owned by Stathoulis, Takis
- Other trademarks owned by Stathoulis, Takis
- Other trademarks owned by Stathoulis, Joanne
- Other trademarks owned by Stathoulis, Takis
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named FRISCO'S DRIVE-IN CAR HOP HOME OF THE FAMOUS FRISCO BURGER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 6, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 3, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 25, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2003 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 1999 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Nov 16, 1998 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1993 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 10, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 20, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 18, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 28, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |