USPTO serial 74145355
CLIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RITCHY, MICHELLE M.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CLIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Thunderbird Technologies, Inc.
Research Triangle Park, NC
Thunderbird Technologies, Inc.
Research Triangle Park, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mitchell S. Bigel
MITCHELL S BIGEL P O DRAWER 34009BELL, SELTZER, PARK & GIBSON, PACHARLOTTE, NC 28234UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | microelectronic devices; namely, integrated circuit chips and computer software for use in designing microelectronic devices; namely, integrated circuit chips | ABANDONED | May 12, 1993 |
| 042 | design of microelectronic devices and computer software for use in designing microelectronic devices | ABANDONED | May 12, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Thunderbird Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Thunderbird Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CLIP
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 26, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 1995 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 22, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 10, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 12, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 21, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 8, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 26, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 3, 1991 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 8, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 27, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |