USPTO serial 74145608
BELL & HOWELL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 23, 1993
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BELL & HOWELL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Skokie, IL
LINCOLNWOOD, IL
Skokie, IL
Skokie, IL
DURHAM, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey L. Wilson
Jeffrey L. Wilson Jenkins, Wilson, Taylor, & Hunt P.A.3100 Tower Blvd.University Tower, Suite 1200Durham, NC 27707Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical guidepath fluid for robotic mail distribution vehicles[ and carpet cleaning chemicals] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1985 |
| 007 | paper folding machines; automated mail opening machines; electro-mechanical mail addressing and printing systems, namely non-impact programmable addressing machines utilizing ink jet printers; document and mail sorting machines; document and mail collating and inserting machines; document and mail bar coding machines; document and mail encoding machines; document slitting, merging and imprinting machines; envelope inserting and sealing machines; envelope opening machines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1985 |
| 009 | [computer assisted document management systems for the storage and retrieval of documents on microfilm consisting of a computer, computer monitor, optical disk drive, microfilm cameras, microfilm/reader/printers and system software; computer assisted management systems for storage and retrieval of documents on optical disk consisting of a computer, computer monitor, optical disk drive, digital scanner, laser printer, and systems software; microfilm diazo film duplicating systems namely, self-contained microfilm processor and film printer; diazo film; microfilm and microfilm jacket vesicular duplicating equipment; document search systems consisting of optical disk drive, monitor, document scanner, and microfilm camera/recorder/indexer; microfilming systems consising of rotary microfilm recorder, microfilm encoder, and computer; ]computer monitoring systems, namely, computer monitor and software therefor for monitoring the efficiency of mail inserting machines; computer assisted document storage and retrieval systems consisting of a minicomputer, [microfilm recorder, microfilm reader/printer] and system software; computer scanners;[computer hardware namely, monitors, printers, disc and tape drives; computer graphic display work stations; comprising a computer, computer monitor, optical disk drive, laser printer and system software; microfiche cards; microfilm/microfiche readers; microfilm/microfiche processors; microfilm/microfiche jacket duplicators; microfilm/microfiche cameras; microfilm/microfiche recorders; microfilm/microfiche reader/printers; microfilm/microfiche jacket inserters; microfilm/microfiche jacket labeling machines; microfilm/microfiche printer/fillers; microfilm/microfiche jacket readers; microfilm/microfiche jackets;] optical character reading machines, [document and mail weighing apparatus] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1985 |
| 012 | automatically controlled wheeled delivery vehicles for office use, trailers therefor and structural parts therefor; automatically controlled seft-propelled delivery vehicles for office use and trailers therefor and structural parts therefor | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1985 |
| 016 | [publications; namely, user guides describing applicant's computer database time-sharing services and instructional manuals] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bell & Howell Company
- Other trademarks owned by BELL & HOWELL COMPANY
- Other trademarks owned by Bell & Howell Company
- Other trademarks owned by Bell & Howell Company
- Other trademarks owned by BELL AND HOWELL, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named BELL & HOWELL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2019 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 19, 2018 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 16, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 21, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2013 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 5, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 5, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 22, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 10, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 6, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 24, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Nov 25, 2003 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 25, 2003 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 1999 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 22, 1999 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 1, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 30, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 21, 1992 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 10, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 30, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |