USPTO serial 74147194
VIVA MARGARITA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIVA MARGARITA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laura W. Packer
LAURA W PACKER O'CONNOR, PACKER & WILCOX1420 KETTNER BLVD STE 420SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | a margarita mix with tequila | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 21, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 21, 1994 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 28, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 14, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 3, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 25, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 1991 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |