USPTO serial 74147251
KANEKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLD, BARBARA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KANEKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Nerima-ku, Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin J. Beran
MARTIN J BERAN BLUM KAPLAN1120 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | video frequency apparatus such as video tape recorder, video camera and video disk player; magnetic disks recorded with computer program; magnetic tapes recorded with computer program; apparatus including electronic circuit recorded with computer program; video software game machines (playthings) for home use; records; recorded sound magnetic tape, recorded sound magnetic disk; printed matters such as books, magazines and newspapers; recorded video magnetic tape and recorded video magnetic disk1 | ABANDONED | — |
| 028 | coin-operated video game machines for business use, ROM cartridges for TV game, business use and magnetic tape cartridges for TV game, for business use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |