Drawing for BOOTLEGGER

USPTO serial 74147280

BOOTLEGGER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2048524Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 1, 1997
Examiner
PEDERSEN, CHRIS A F
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOOTLEGGER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ellen A. Efros

TA BOOTLEGGER II SEAGULL ENTERPRISES, INC1420 WISCONSIN AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042retail shoe store servicesSECTION 18 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 9, 2003CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Apr 9, 2003C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Apr 9, 2003CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Dec 20, 2002CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jun 7, 2001PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 1, 1997R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 31, 1997CU.TCONCURRENT USE TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 20, 1996CU.GCONCURRENT USE GRANTED NO. 999999—
May 17, 1995CU.ICONCURRENT USE PROC. INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 21, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 17, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 16, 1994CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 26, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 1991ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 19, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 13, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance