USPTO serial 74147525
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven H. Akre
STEVEN H AKRE AKRE, WENDT & FISCHERBAILEY COURT STE 6507911 FORSYTH BLVDST LOUIS, MO 63105| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic digital display unit storing information primarily used by aircraft pilots, navigators and travelers | ABANDONED | Jan 22, 1991 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 1993 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 23, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jun 1, 1992 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 12, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 20, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |