USPTO serial 74149088
CARD BASEBALL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SANOK, DAWNMARIE DISTEFANO
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CARD BASEBALL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen P. Carponelli
STEPHEN P CARPONELLI CARPONELLI & KRUGSTE 235055 W MONROE STCHICAGO, IL 60603Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | board game simulating a baseball game and using players' own baseball cards to represent ball players | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 23, 1994 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 10, 1993 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 9, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |