USPTO serial 74149187
WALLET SECURITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WALLET SECURITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
R. A. Ryan
R A RYAN AT&T131 MORRISTOWN RDBASKING RIDGE, NJ 07920-1650UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AT&T UNIVERSAL CARD SERVICES CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by AT&T UNIVERSAL CARD SERVICES CORP.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named WALLET SECURITY
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 1994 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 20, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 12, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 1993 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 4, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 31, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 7, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 6, 1991 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 13, 1991 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 4, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |