USPTO serial 74149457
GOLDEN FLEECE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1949836Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 1996
- Examiner
- KREBS, CATHERINE K.
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GOLDEN FLEECE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
ENFIELD, CT
New York, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
ENFIELD, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa W. Rosaya
Lisa W. Rosaya Baker & McKenzie LLP452 Fifth AvenueNew York, NY 10018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely suits, shirts, pants, jackets, robes, shoes, tops, bottoms, socks, ties, hats, and coats | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BROOKS BROTHERS GROUP, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BROOKS BROTHERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BROOKS BROTHERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BROOKS BROTHERS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by RETAIL BRAND ALLIANCE, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named GOLDEN FLEECE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 27, 2020 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 5, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Aug 17, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 12, 2008 | PCBM | PETITION TO DIRECTOR WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 6, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 1, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 24, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 17, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | RRPR | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION | — |
| May 21, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2007 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Feb 7, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 26, 2005 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2002 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 1996 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 31, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 2, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 16, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 9, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 12, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 30, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |