USPTO serial 74150863
SENSATIONAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SENSATIONAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Albert P. Sharpe, III
ALBERT P SHARPE III FAY, SHARPE, BEALL, FAGAN, ET ALSTE 7001100 SUPERIOR AVECLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KONINKLIJKE AHOLD NV
- Other trademarks owned by AHOLD RETAIL SERVICES AG
- Other trademarks owned by AHOLD RETAIL SERVICES AG
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named SENSATIONAL
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 17, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 27, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 1, 1998 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jul 1, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 20, 1997 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 30, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 25, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 11, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 1993 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 31, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 14, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 12, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 22, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |