Drawing for POWER SYSTEM SPECIALISTS

USPTO serial 74152059

POWER SYSTEM SPECIALISTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GREER, CYNTHIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POWER SYSTEM SPECIALISTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew R. Basile

ANDREW R BASILE BASILE AND HANLON, PCSTE 2101650 W BIG BEAVER RDTROY, MI 48084

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
037maintenance and/or repair and system start-up of electrical power distribution equipmentABANDONEDAug 24, 1982
042technical supervision, inspection and testing in the field of electrical power distribution equipmentABANDONEDAug 24, 1982

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 10, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 19, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 19, 1994EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Dec 6, 1993CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 6, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 5, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 13, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 12, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 19, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 5, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance