USPTO serial 74152729
20/20
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES, CARYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 20/20?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George P. Pappas
GEORGE P PAPPAS MILLER, MORRISS & PAPPAS219 S GRAND AVELANSING, MI 48933UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | clothing care preparations, namely clothing and fabric cleaning and spot and stain remover preparations which are commercially sold solely and directly to professional dry cleaning establishments | ABANDONED | Nov 9, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 31, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 31, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 1, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 1, 1996 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 3, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 8, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 17, 1995 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 3, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 25, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 17, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |