USPTO serial 74153244
PROMOTRAC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GRAY, CAROLYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PROMOTRAC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Harold W. Reick
HAROLD W REICK PRICE, HENEVELD, COOPER, DEWITT & LITTON695 KENMORE S EP O BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | analyzing promotional campaigns for store brand products of others to determine the effectiveness of the promotional campaigns for the sale of those goods | ABANDONED | Apr 12, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 25, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 3, 1995 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Nov 2, 1993 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 10, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 20, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 1993 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 13, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 29, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 29, 1992 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 3, 1992 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 26, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 24, 1991 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 18, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 3, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 2, 1991 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 13, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |