Drawing for THERMOSELECT

USPTO serial 74153573

THERMOSELECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DEMOS, JOHN C., JR.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THERMOSELECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa M. DuRoss

LISA M DUROSS WEINTRAUB, DUROSS & BRADYSTE 5043001 W BIG BEAVER RDTROY, MI 48084

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035management of recycling plants for others and consulting services related thereto; patent agency and industrial property consultation and licensing servicesABANDONED—
036stock and bond brokerage services; financial investment services in the fields of real estate and securities; financial management services; financial planning services; financing services; rental and leasing of real estate; real estate agency services; real estate brokerage services; real estate investment services; real estate management servicesABANDONED—
037real estate development services; custom construction of recycling plantsABANDONED—
040recycling services; waste treatment servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 24, 1995PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Dec 2, 1994PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 1994PCRCPETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 1994LSOULATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE—
Jun 9, 1994ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 22, 1994EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 1993EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 8, 1993NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 16, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 12, 1993NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 13, 1993CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 30, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 10, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 6, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance