USPTO serial 74155230
PLAY TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TINGLEY, JOHN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PLAY TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kwai Chung, HK
Kwai Chung, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard Eugene Dick
RICHARD EUGENE DICK DICK AND HARRISSTE 3800181 W MADISON STCHICAGO, IL 60602Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electronic cassette tape recorders/players; radios; electronic special effects apparatus, binoculars with sound pick-up and amplifiers; and radio transmitter and/or receiver units with infant monitors and intercoms | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 3, 1997 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 25, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 30, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 2, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 10, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 25, 1995 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 24, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 11, 1994 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 14, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 9, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 1994 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |