Drawing for SURVIVAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.

USPTO serial 74155507

SURVIVAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1701601Status 900
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jul 21, 1992
Examiner
SMITH, LAURA E
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SURVIVAL TECHNOLOGY, INC.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Seana Smith

Seana Smith Pfizer Inc.150 East 42nd StreetNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010hypodermic medication injectorsEXPIRED—
040[ custom manufacture of medications and medical devices for others ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 22, 2013CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jun 3, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 3, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 19, 2010ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 26, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 22, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 31, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 23, 1999C15PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 13, 1998PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Jul 27, 1998RRPRRESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION—
Jul 23, 1998815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Jul 21, 1992R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 28, 1992PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 27, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 1991CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 21, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 21, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance