USPTO serial 74155667
MASTERS PORTFOLIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MASTERS PORTFOLIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary Miller
GARY MILLER BRESLOW & WALKER875 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-7597UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | management of investment portfolios | ABANDONED | Jan 1, 1992 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 1994 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Dec 15, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Sep 10, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 30, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 30, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 1992 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 28, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 10, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 20, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1991 | ZZZZ | ALLOWANCE/COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 16, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |