USPTO serial 74155945
SPUMONI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, JEFFREY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPUMONI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
South San Francisco, CA
South San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frances G. Smith
FRANCES G SMITH OLIFF & BERRIDGEP O BOX 19928ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | baby multiple activity toys, bath toys, bathtub toys, children's multiple activity toys, infant action crib toys, inflatable ride-on toys, inflatable bath toys, non-riding transportation toys, party favors in the nature of small toys, plush toys, stuffed animal toys, rag dolls, dolls, accessories for dolls, playsets for dolls, doll cases, clothing for dolls, costumes and house furnishings for dolls, ride-on toys, soft-sculpture toys, stuffed toys, water squirting toys, wind-up toys, wind-up walking toys, action figure toys, toy boxes (furniture), toy vehicles; game equipment sold as a unit for playing an action-type target game, game equipment sold as a unit for playing a board game, game equipment sold as a unit for playing a card game, game equipment sold as a unit for playing a manipulative game, game equipment sold as a unit for playing a paddle ball game, game equipment sold as a unit for playing a parlor game, game equipment sold as a unit for playing a pinball-type game, educational board game, game equipment containing memory devices; namely, discs (computer), game equipment with a watch function (electronic), game equipment; namely, chips, game machines (video output), game materials (promotional), game tables, game equipment; namely, game wheels | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 1993 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 18, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 7, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 9, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |