USPTO serial 74156317
LINEAR SET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LINEAR SET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
D-8720 Schweinfurt, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David Toren
KATRIN LEWERTOFF SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | rolling element bearings, pillow blocks; pillow block units consisting of housing and rolling element bearings; rolling element bearings designed as bearing units | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 2, 1994 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 2, 1994 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 2, 1994 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 30, 1993 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 6, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |