Drawing for LITE BITE

USPTO serial 74156382

LITE BITE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LITE BITE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John H. Rodgers

JOHN H RODGERS THE SOUTHLAND CORPORATION2711 N HASKELL AVEDALLAS, TX 75204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030sandwiches, namely hot dogs and bunsACTIVEMar 18, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 3, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 2, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 2, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 29, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 6, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 3, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 6, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance