USPTO serial 74157233
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Maidenhead, Berkshire, GB
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jane B. Linowitz
JANE B LINOWITZ LEVISOHN, LERNER AND BERGER757 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | boardgames | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 5, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |