USPTO serial 74157688
BON COUPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANI, LALITHA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BON COUPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul C. Van Slyke
PAUL C VAN SLYKE PRAVEL, GAMBRELL, HEWITT, ET ALSTE 10101177 W LOOP SHOUSTON, TX 77027Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | hair care products; namely, shampoo, finishing rinse, styling gel, hair spray, spray mousse, and conditioner; skin care products; namely, cleansing lotions, clarifying lotions, and moisturizing lotions; cosmetics; namely, make-up base, pressed powder blush, eye shadow, eye liner, mascara, lip gloss, and lipstick; toiletries; namely, bath oil, bathing gel, and deodorant; nail care products; namely, cuticle cream, nail strengthener, nail polish, nail polish remover; cologne; perfume; and sunscreen | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 2, 1993 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 13, 1993 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 13, 1993 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 10, 1992 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 5, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 23, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |