USPTO serial 74157730
WORKING IN HARMONY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with WORKING IN HARMONY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John E. Reilly
JOHN E REILLY1554 EMERSONDENVER, CO 80218UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | prerecorded audio tapes featuring training in relaxation techniques during pregnancy and child birth | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Melmed, M. H.
- Other trademarks owned by Scholljegerdes, Sherry
- Other trademarks owned by Scholljegerdes, Sherry
- Other trademarks owned by Melmed, M. H.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named WORKING IN HARMONY
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 12, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 14, 1993 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 1, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 2, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 10, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 7, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |