USPTO serial 74158290
GLOBAL DYNAMICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CATALDO, PETER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GLOBAL DYNAMICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Feldman
MARK I FELDMAN RUDNICK & WOLFE203 N LASALLE STCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | conducting seminars in franchise management | ABANDONED | Apr 18, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Global Dynamics International Franchising Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Global Dynamics International Franchising Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named GLOBAL DYNAMICS
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 21, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 1992 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 8, 1992 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 20, 1992 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 19, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 25, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 25, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |