Drawing for THE BETTER NAME BRAND

USPTO serial 74158872

THE BETTER NAME BRAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
OFFICE OF TRADEMARK PROGRAM CONTROL

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE BETTER NAME BRAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Peter P. Price

PETER P PRICE PRICE, HENEVELD, COOPER, DEWITT & LITTON695 KENMOOR, S EP O BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003antiperspirants and deodorants for personal use, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, hair spray, skin care lotions, sun screen preparations, tanning lotions, baby oil; oral hygiene preparations; namely, dentifrices, mouthwashes, dental rinses, denture cleansers, denture adhesive creams, and denture creamsABANDONED—
005anal care medicated preparations; namely, suppositories, analgesics, antacids, antihistamines, cough medications, medicated dandruff shampoo, decongestants; diet aids; namely, dietary drink mix for use as a meal replacement and weight control supplements; food supplements, laxatives; sleeping medication; vitamins and mineralsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 23, 1996ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 23, 1996EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 15, 1995EXPREX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED—
Aug 10, 1995EXAREXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART—
Apr 19, 1995CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Feb 23, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 9, 1995EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 6, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 1995ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 30, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Aug 18, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 1994CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 1994CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 5, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 1992AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Nov 4, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 1992IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 8, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 12, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 11, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance