USPTO serial 74158872
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Peter P. Price
PETER P PRICE PRICE, HENEVELD, COOPER, DEWITT & LITTON695 KENMOOR, S EP O BOX 2567GRAND RAPIDS, MI 49501| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | antiperspirants and deodorants for personal use, hair shampoo, hair conditioner, hair spray, skin care lotions, sun screen preparations, tanning lotions, baby oil; oral hygiene preparations; namely, dentifrices, mouthwashes, dental rinses, denture cleansers, denture adhesive creams, and denture creams | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | anal care medicated preparations; namely, suppositories, analgesics, antacids, antihistamines, cough medications, medicated dandruff shampoo, decongestants; diet aids; namely, dietary drink mix for use as a meal replacement and weight control supplements; food supplements, laxatives; sleeping medication; vitamins and minerals | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 1996 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 23, 1996 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 15, 1995 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Aug 10, 1995 | EXAR | EXPARTE APPEAL AFFIRMED/REVERSED IN PART | — |
| Apr 19, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 9, 1995 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 30, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 5, 1993 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 30, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 4, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 4, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 8, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 24, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |