Drawing for FRIDGEKOUPONKEEPER

USPTO serial 74158900

FRIDGEKOUPONKEEPER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BURKE, MICHAEL J.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRIDGEKOUPONKEEPER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Richard O. Bartz

RICHARD O BARTZ BURD, BARTZ & GUTENKAUF1300 FOSHAY TWRMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020flat plastic holders having magnetic supports and pockets for sheet materials, namely lists, memos, schedules, cards, photographs, advertisements, checks, currency, announcements, messages, letters, envelopes, stamps, documents, bills, statements, invoices, licenses, regulations, warranties, news releases, labels and recipesABANDONEDMar 20, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 14, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 13, 1993EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 13, 1993EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 29, 1992EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 15, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 9, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 12, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 24, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance