USPTO serial 74159124
GENTLEMAN DUCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GENTLEMAN DUCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Yungho City, Taipei County, TW
Yungho City, Taipei County, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles M. Marmelstein
CHARLES M MARMELSTEIN METROPOLITAN SQSTE 330 - G ST LOBBY655 - 13TH ST N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-5704Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | leather products, namely belts | ABANDONED | Nov 15, 1990 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 5, 1996 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 5, 1996 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 1996 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 23, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 3, 1995 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 4, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 15, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 14, 1994 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1992 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |