USPTO serial 74159831
MRS. PATERSON'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 1776099Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 8, 1993
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- TMEO LAW OFFICE 13
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MRS. PATERSON'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
AUSSIE FOODS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Los Angeles, CA
AUSSIE FOODS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Los Angeles, CA
Mankato, MN
AUSTIN, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason K. Schmitz
Jason Schmitz BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP300 East Randolph StreetSuite 5000CHICAGO, IL 60601Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AUSSIE FOODS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by AUSSIE FOODS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by AUSSIE FOODS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by HORMEL FOODS CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named MRS. PATERSON'S
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 2013 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Apr 16, 2013 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 10, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | PR89 | RESPONSE RECEIVED TO POST REG. ACTION - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Apr 8, 2013 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2013 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Feb 7, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 30, 1998 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 15, 1997 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 1997 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 1993 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 5, 1992 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 5, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 19, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 3, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |