Drawing for MANDARIN EXPRESS CHINESE FOOD

USPTO serial 74160327

MANDARIN EXPRESS CHINESE FOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARMINE, F. D.
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MANDARIN EXPRESS CHINESE FOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Laurence P. Colton

LAURENCE P COLTON HURT, RICHARDSON, GARNER, ET ALSTE 1400999 PEACHTREE ST N EATLANTA, GA 30309-3999

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042reataurant servicesABANDONEDMar 1, 1987

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 12, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 24, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 30, 1993ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 30, 1993EXDMEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT—
Dec 23, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 16, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 12, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 24, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 16, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 19, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance