USPTO serial 74160805
MULTI-PLIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLE RICHARD G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MULTI-PLIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SF00101 Helsinki 10, FI
SF00101 Helsinki 10, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ralph H. Lane
RALPH H LANE FOLEY & LARDNER777 E WISCONSIN AVEMILWAUKEE, WI 53202-5367UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | manually-operated tools; namely, cork screws, saws, adjustable wrenches, bicycle tire tools, awls, marlin spikes, fish scalers, hook disgorgers, pullers, wire strippers, fire strikers, snips, pruners, loppers, weeders, valve stem removal tools, rotary cutting wheels, scrapers, seam rippers, tweezers, tooth picks, ski boot wrenches, shroud cutters, linoleum knives, patch cutters, nipple tools, cappers, and combinations of one or more of the foregoing tools | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | point gap setters, tire pressure gauges, and magnets | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 14, 1995 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 8, 1995 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 13, 1995 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1994 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 13, 1994 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 22, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 7, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 2, 1993 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 29, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 20, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 1993 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 5, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 1993 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 2, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 1991 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 30, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |