USPTO serial 74160877
TRIPLE OPTION PROTECTION SERIES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 18, 1993
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with TRIPLE OPTION PROTECTION SERIES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald V. Thurman
RONALD V THURMAN HUBBARD, THURMAN, TUCKER AND HARRISSTE 210013355 NOEL RDDALLAS, TX 75240-6604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | life and medical insurance brokerage and administration services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 1, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2000 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 18, 1993 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 19, 1993 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 19, 1993 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 25, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 24, 1992 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| May 18, 1992 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| May 1, 1992 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 1992 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1991 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 9, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 31, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 9, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |