Drawing for Serial No. 74161154

USPTO serial 74161154

Serial No. 74161154

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MIRMAN, DONNA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 74161154?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cecilia L. Yu

CECILIA L YUSTE 212801 S GARFIELD AVEALHAMBRA, CA 91801

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030food additives for non-nutritional purposes for use a flavoring, ingredient or filler and food additives...in capsule formABANDONEDNov 29, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 7, 1993PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Sep 16, 1993PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Sep 1, 1993PILMPETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED—
Jul 12, 1993PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 1993ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 20, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 24, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 5, 1991CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 8, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance