Drawing for Serial No. 74161189

USPTO serial 74161189

Serial No. 74161189

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RUPP, TERRY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 74161189?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian D. Anderson

BRIAN D ANDERSON OBLON, SPIVAK, MCCLELLAND, MAIER, ET ALFOURTH FL1755 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005insecticides, insect and arthropod repellents for application to fabricABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 4, 1995ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 3, 1995EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 3, 1995EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 29, 1994CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
May 4, 1994CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 7, 1994JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 7, 1994EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 22, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 17, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 1993CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 15, 1992IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Apr 15, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 2, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 27, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 7, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance