USPTO serial 74161657
BRUTULL BOYZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHAW, THOMAS V
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRUTULL BOYZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
G. Donald Weber, Jr.
G DONALD WEBER JRSTE 1700333 CITY BLVD WORANGE, CA 92668Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing; namely, shirts, T-shirts, shoes, sweatshirts, hats, jackets, spandex tights, baggy pants, shorts, swim suits | ABANDONED | Feb 15, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 15, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 25, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 13, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 17, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 16, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 10, 1992 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 10, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |