Drawing for VALHALLA PURE

USPTO serial 74161840

VALHALLA PURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LUPO, ANTHONY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VALHALLA PURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JAMES W. HELLWEGE

JAMES W HELLWEGE JONES, TULLAR AND COOPER, PCP O BOX 2266 EADS STATIONARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025women's clothing; namely, tops, blouses, shirts, pullovers, tanktops, T-shirts, sweatshirt, skirts, shorts that are lined or unlined, slacks and shorts and men's clothing; namely, tops, pullovers, T-shirts, sweatshirts, lined or unlined shorts made of canvas and jersey fabric and pants made of canvas fabricABANDONEDAug 10, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 25, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 23, 1994ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 23, 1994EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 23, 1994EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 22, 1993CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 22, 1993DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 1993EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 12, 1993CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 28, 1992CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 14, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 13, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 28, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance