Drawing for PRIX D'EXCELLENCE MARIE CLAIRE

USPTO serial 74162048

PRIX D'EXCELLENCE MARIE CLAIRE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 1764405Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 13, 1993
Examiner
BRUCE, MARY FRANCES
Law office
SCANNING ON DEMAND

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with PRIX D'EXCELLENCE MARIE CLAIRE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016paper products; namely, postcards, greeting cards, and visiting cards, photographs, books, magazines, and newspapers whose subject matter covers topics of general interest; namely, fashion, beauty, home design, psychology, current events, and travelSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—
041arranging and conducting competitions in the field of cosmetics, fashion, home design and educationSECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2016CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Aug 1, 2008CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 1, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Aug 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2003RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
May 17, 200389AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Mar 10, 200389AFREGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED—
Mar 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 8, 19998.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Apr 8, 19998.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Apr 13, 1993R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 19, 1993PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 18, 1992NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 4, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 4, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 16, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 29, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 27, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 4, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 1991UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance