USPTO serial 74162177
ED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
EDELWEISS JEWELLERY (FAR EAST) LTD
Tsimshatsui, Kowloon, HK
Other trademarks owned by EDELWEISS JEWELLERY (FAR EAST) LTD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherman A. Kulick
SHERMAN A KULICK8827 EXPOSITION BLVDCULVER CITY, CA 90232UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | 14kt; 18kt; gold and platinum jewelry with or without diamonds precious and/or semi-precious stones | ABANDONED | Jul 2, 1989 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 1994 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 22, 1994 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Feb 22, 1994 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Sep 3, 1993 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jun 1, 1993 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 11, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 27, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 28, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |