USPTO serial 74162552
QUICK LINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LE, MARGARET
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUICK LINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mount Gilead, NC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Dalbert U. Shefte
DALBERT U SHEFTE SHEFTE, PINCKNEY & SAWYER3740 ONE FIRST UNION CTR301 S COLLEGE STCHARLOTTE, NC 28202-6020Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | bar code readers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 1995 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 27, 1995 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 27, 1995 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 3, 1995 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 10, 1994 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 1993 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 4, 1993 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 19, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 13, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 9, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |