USPTO serial 74162797
RETURN ON SPENDING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RETURN ON SPENDING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Koch
ROBERT J KOCH FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI801 PENNSYLVANIA AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | administering a purchasing and savings program consisting of goods, services and contributions that fund retirement savings accounts, annuity contracts and cash refunds through rebates to members for purchases of goods and services from participating vendors | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Spend Today And Retire Tomorrow, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Spend Today And Retire Tomorrow, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named RETURN ON SPENDING
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 19, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 28, 1995 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 27, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 27, 1994 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 1994 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 1, 1994 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 19, 1994 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 1994 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 8, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 1994 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1994 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 1993 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1993 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 17, 1993 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1992 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 25, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 24, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 12, 1991 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 1991 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 2, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 26, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 4, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |