Drawing for CARPE DIEM

USPTO serial 74162904

CARPE DIEM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HORRALL, PATRICIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CARPE DIEM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory W. Carr

GREGORY W CARR GARDERE & WYNNE3000 THANKSGIVING TWR1601 ELM STDALLAS, TX 75201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042computer software technical support for others; namely, providing assistance in the installation, use and upgrade of software in the field of professional services administration and accountingABANDONEDJan 22, 1992

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 13, 1994ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 11, 1994DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 1993CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 1993DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 5, 1993DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Nov 12, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 5, 1992ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Sep 29, 1992CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 17, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 15, 1992CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 15, 1992DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 15, 1992IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
May 6, 1992AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 27, 1992CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 11, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 11, 1992IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 11, 1992CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 1991CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 1991DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance