USPTO serial 74163254
PAUL REVERE SILVERSMITHS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PAUL REVERE SILVERSMITHS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin B. Pavane
MARTIN B PAVANE COHEN, PONTANI, LIEBERMAN & PAVANE551 FIFTH AVE STE 1210NEW YORK, NY 10176UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | items plated with precious metal; namely, holloware | ABANDONED | Aug 5, 1987 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 1995 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 11, 1995 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Oct 11, 1995 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 1994 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 1994 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 11, 1994 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 26, 1994 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 1994 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 18, 1993 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 8, 1993 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Apr 27, 1993 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 31, 1993 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 24, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 1991 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 27, 1991 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 25, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |