USPTO serial 74163307
COKEES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITAKER, LAURIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with COKEES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norman P. Soloway
NORMAN P SOLOWAY HAYES SOLOWAY PC3450 E SUNRISE DR STE 140TUCSON, AZ 85718UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | housemark for fruit-based snack foods or snack food mix consisting primarily of fruits, nuts, raisins and banana, fruit, potato and yucca chips | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | housemark for cereal, rice or wheat based snack foods, candied fruit snack foods or snack food mix consisting primarily of crackers, pretzels, popped popcorn and taco, corn and tortilla chips | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 19, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 16, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 16, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 29, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 10, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |