USPTO serial 74163318
ROLL-O-FRUIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROLL-O-FRUIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LES MENTHES RITO LTEE - RITO MINTS LTD.
Trois Rivieres, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by LES MENTHES RITO LTEE - RITO MINTS LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN SCARBOROUGH STATIONMCGLEW AND TUTTLE, PCSCARBOROUGH, NY 10510-0827UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | candy | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 2, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 7, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 11, 1995 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 18, 1993 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1993 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 1992 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 11, 1992 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 1991 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |