USPTO serial 74164058
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Redmond, WA
Redmond, WA
Redmond, WA
Redmond, WA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew J. Smith
Matthew J. Smith Polsinelli Shalton Flanigan Suelthaus Pc100 S. Fourth St.Suite 1100St. Louis, MO 63102| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | body and skin cleansing preparation for babies, diaper rash cream, baby lotion, baby powder, and baby shampoo | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 23, 1992 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| May 7, 2005 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Aug 17, 1999 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1995 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Nov 14, 1994 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 2, 1994 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 25, 1994 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 7, 1994 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 3, 1994 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 1993 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 27, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 11, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 1993 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 1992 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 9, 1992 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 25, 1992 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 16, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1992 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 13, 1991 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |