USPTO serial 74164109
INTERLINK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOORHEAD CORA ANN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERLINK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRIAN J. LAURENZO
BRIAN J LAURENZO DAVIS, HOCKENBERG, WINE, BROWNKOEHN & SHORS, PC666 WALNUT ST STE 2500DES MOINES, IA 50309Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer hardware and software for controlling an injection molding process for use by the injection molding industry | ABANDONED | May 31, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HETTINGA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HETTINGA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Hettinga Equipment, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named INTERLINK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 9, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 9, 1994 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 30, 1993 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 1993 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 1993 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 20, 1993 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 14, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1992 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 15, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 7, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 1991 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 12, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 23, 1991 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |