USPTO serial 74164136
POLYTAN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, ANDREW D
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with POLYTAN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joyce B. Klemmer
JOYCE B KLEMMER SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL1230 PEACHTREE ST NESTE 3100ATLANTA, GA 30309-3592Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | synthetic sports surface coverings produced of or produced with plastic or rubber consisting of elastic binders, coating and sealing materials for use as a permanent structure | ABANDONED | Feb 27, 1986 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 2, 1994 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 6, 1994 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 6, 1994 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 3, 1992 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 7, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 1992 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 20, 1992 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 1992 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1992 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 1992 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 17, 1991 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 1991 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |